| HOME WISE Uranium Project > Mining & Milling > Industry > |

(last updated 10 Apr 2009)
> for old mines, see Decommissioning Data - Canada
| GENERAL INFORMATION |
Mineral and Commodity Review: Uranium
(Natural Resources Canada)
Canadian Uranium Fact Sheet
(Natural Resources Canada)
| NORTHWEST TERRITORIES & NUNAVUT |









| BRITISH COLUMBIA |

| 1979 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 4,010 t U | 6 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.21% U | 0.14% U | |||


| ALBERTA |

| SASKATCHEWAN |

| End 2006 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 385 t U | 6,962 t U | 846 t U | 1,538 t U | |
| Ore grade: | 0.98% U | 1.0% U | 0.46% U | 0.50% U | |
[ISSUES] · [MORE ISSUES] ·
[DETAILS (CAMECO)] ![]()
Mineral Deposit Info:
Rabbit Lake
·
Collins Bay A
/
B, D, E, F
·
Eagle Point
/
North
/
South ![]()
The mill is scheduled for a one-year temporary shutdown in the first quarter of 2001. In 2002, the mill will continue operation and process the residual ore from the Eagle Point deposit and 57% of the Cigar Lake ore.
Rabbit Lake Joint Venture


The ore deposits are mined out; the mill is processing ore from the McArthur River mine.

[ISSUES] · [MORE ISSUES] · [DETAILS: COGEMA RES.
]
Mineral Deposit Info: Cluff Lake D
·
OP Deposit
·
Dominique-Janine North/ Ext.
·
Dominique-Peter

| March 16, 2007 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 87,038 t U | 2,536 t U | 45,462 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 17.5% U | 4.1% U | 14.3% U | ||
> Calculate Mine Feasibility
[ISSUES] · [DETAILS: CAMECO
· COGEMA RES.
]
Mineral Deposit Info:
Cigar Lake ![]()
57% of the Cigar Lake ore is to be milled at the Rabbit Lake mill. The remainder is to be milled at McClean Lake.
Cigar Lake Mining Corp - CLMC

Dawn Lake joint venture

| Dec. 31, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 65,423 t U | 62,500 t U | 16,308 t U | 2,846 t U | 53,462 t U |
| Ore grade: | 14.6% U | 22.3% U | 7.8% U | 7.1% U | 8.3% U |
Aerial view: Google Maps
[ISSUES] · [OLDER ISSUES]
Mineral Deposit Info:
McArthur River ![]()
The ore from the McArthur River mine is processed at the Key Lake mill.
McArthur River joint venture


| End 2005 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 4,912 t U | 8,115 t U | 957 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 0.68% U | 1% U | 1% U | ||
McClean North Deposit
| Mar. 6, 2007 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 4,415 t U | 21 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 2.4% U | 0.63% U | |||
Mineral Deposit Info:
JEB
·
McClean North
/
South
/
Sue
/ Caribou
Aerial view: Google Maps
[ISSUES] · [OLDER ISSUES] · [DETAILS: COGEMA RES.
]
The mill is to process the Midwest ore and 43% of the Cigar Lake ore.
McClean Lake joint venture

| End 2005 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 10,262 t U | 2,247 t U | 2,252 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 6% U | 1.8% U | 3.9% U | ||
> Calculate Mine Feasibility
[ISSUES] · [DETAILS: COGEMA RES.
]
The ore is to be milled at McClean Lake.
| Reserves | Resources | ||||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 2,200 t U | 1,700 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.48% U | 18.0% U | |||
Midwest Joint Venture

| End 2006 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 14,423 t U | 3,731 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 3.2% U | 1.7% U | |||
Cree Extension Joint Venture

> Download Technical Report April 3, 2009 (8.5M PDF)
(SEDAR)
Aerial view: Google Maps







| Jan. 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 608 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.77% U | ||||
> Download Technical Report Feb. 17, 2009 (10.4MB)
(SEDAR)
| Sep. 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 7,190 t U | 548 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.20% U | 0.18% U | |||
> Download Technical Report Nov. 12, 2008
· Technical Report Nov. 13, 2008
·
Technical Report Feb. 17, 2009 (10.4MB)
(SEDAR)
| Jan. 2009 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 3,519 t U | 435 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.089% U | 0.089% U | |||
> Download Technical Report Feb. 17, 2009 (10.4MB)
(SEDAR)














| ONTARIO |


> Download Technical Report, June 29, 2007
(5.1M PDF)

| Oct. 4, 2007 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 2,458 t U | 13,904 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.043% U | 0.037% U | |||
> Calculate Mine Feasibility
[ISSUES]
| QUEBEC |



| July 25, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 1,435 t U | 5,027 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.58% U | 0.37% U | |||
> Calculate Mine Feasibility
[ISSUES]



| NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR |


| Feb. 25, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Michelin Lake, underground | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size: | 1,273 t U | 17,147 t U | 12,941 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 0.10% U | 0.11% U | 0.10% U | ||
| Michelin Lake, open pit | |||||
| Size: | 3,757 t U | 3,759 t U | 699 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 0.068% U | 0.051% U | 0.042% U | ||
| Jacques Lake, underground | |||||
| Size: | 308 t U | 2,254 t U | 1,768 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 0.076% U | 0.068% U | 0.068% U | ||
| Jacques Lake, open pit | |||||
| Size: | 307 t U | 1,135 t U | 890 t U | ||
| Ore grade: | 0.076% U | 0.059% U | 0.042% U | ||
| Rainbow | |||||
| Size: | 654 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.068% U | ||||
| Nash | |||||
| Size: | 348 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.059% U | ||||
| Inda | |||||
| Size: | 1,745 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.059% U | ||||
| Gear | |||||
| Size: | 101 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.051% U | ||||
Central Mineral Belt (CMB) Joint Venture


Central Mineral Belt (CMB) Joint Venture

| Upper C-Zone Aug. 7, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 1,973 t U | 1,092 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.029% U | 0.020% U | |||
| Lower C-Zone Aug. 7, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 615 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.042% U | ||||
| Area 1 / Trout Pond Aug. 7, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 185 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.047% U | ||||
| Armstrong Aug. 7, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 346 t U | ||||
| Ore grade: | 0.035% U | ||||
> Download Technical Report July 31, 2008 (12.2M PDF)
·
Technical Report Sep. 7, 2007 (6.7M PDF)
(SEDAR)

| April 29, 2008 | Reserves | Resources | |||
| proven | probable | measured | indicated | inferred | |
| Size: | 896 t U | 1,435 t U | |||
| Ore grade: | 0.049% U | 0.045% U | |||
> Download Technical Report June 12, 2008 (2.6M PDF)
(SEDAR)
| NOVA SCOTIA |
| HOME WISE Uranium Project > Mining & Milling > Industry > |